
The most significant news of the week was the continued strikes by the U.S. and Israel on Iran, the resultant spike in oil prices, rising bond yields, and the poor jobs report on Friday, driving markets lower.
Crude had its largest one-week gains on record and closed over $90.
The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq fell 3%, 2% and 1.2%, respectively, for the week. IWM also closed weak and looks lower.
Friday’s employment numbers showed a loss of 92,000 jobs in February, much worse than the gain of 50,000 jobs expected, and well below January’s gain of 126,000 jobs.
This shows that the job market continues to struggle and the unemployment rate rose to 4.4%, creating a dilemma for the Fed’s in having to choose between fighting inflation (which will be worse with the oil spike) and a weakening jobs market.
In response, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said that “Let’s not overreact to one month’s numbers, but an environment in which inflation is rising, and the unemployment rate is also rising, that’s not any fun for the central bank.”.
Energy prices are one of the fastest channels of transmission into the broader economy. When crude rises sharply, it quickly translates into higher fuel costs and transportation expenses, and eventually into inflationary pressure throughout the economy.
The market immediately began discounting those implications.
One of the clearest reactions was in the Dow Jones Transportation Index, which dropped nearly 8% for the week and closed below its rising 50-day moving average. Transportation stocks are highly sensitive to fuel costs and economic expectations, so the sharp decline reflected both.
However, the weakness was not isolated to transportation.
Selling pressure spread broadly across multiple sectors. The only area showing consistent strength was energy.
The sharp rise in interest rates added another layer of concern. When bond yields and energy prices rise simultaneously, markets begin to fear inflation persistence and the possibility that central banks may not have as much policy flexibility as investors had hoped.
That combination of higher rates and higher energy costs is precisely the environment that often brings the word stagflation back into the conversation.
Markets began to price in that possibility.
The Materials sector also experienced broad selling pressure, which is often associated with concerns about slowing economic growth. When industrial materials decline alongside transportation and rising energy costs, it reinforces the perception that economic conditions could tighten.
What we do know with certainty after last week is that the multi-month trading range in the S&P 500 has been broken.
For months, the market oscillated between well-defined support and resistance levels. Last week, prices closed below multiple Pivot Lows, which signals that the prior equilibrium between buyers and sellers has shifted.
From a technical standpoint, that violation signals the beginning of a new downtrend phase, at least in the short- to intermediate-term.
The political drama continues with a partial government shutdown which starting on 2/14 over funding of Department of Homeland Security and ICE. Many employees, including TSA workers, are now working without pay.
Our internal market gauges are beginning to approach levels that historically occur near market lows. However, the way they reached those levels matters.
Breadth collapsed extremely quickly last week.
Rather than deteriorating gradually over several weeks — which is typical of a more orderly correction — breadth moved from neutral conditions directly to near-extreme readings in one sharp movement.
That type of movement often suggests further downside still ahead.
We saw the opposite behavior in November of last year, when breadth surged rapidly from deeply oversold levels to strong positive readings. That sudden shift communicated strong demand, and markets subsequently moved higher.
The current situation is different.
Breadth did not fall from a strong bullish condition into an extreme low. Instead, it moved from neutral directly to extreme, which historically means the market often needs to probe lower levels before a durable bottom forms.
In practical terms, this suggests that rallies are likely to be sold, at least for now.
There were, however, a few constructive developments beneath the surface last week.
Several of the most beaten-down sectors — including Software, Staffing & Outsourcing, and Information Technology — showed relative strength despite the broader market weakness.
When the weakest sectors begin to stabilize while markets are declining, it often signals that institutions are selectively accumulating bargains.
That does not mean a bottom is in place yet.
But if the broader market continues lower and eventually retests the recent lows, those sectors could become the foundation for intermediate-term advances.
Another factor traders should keep in mind is that sharp declines often attract aggressive short-term buying.
Fast drops tend to produce reflex rallies, sometimes quite significant ones. Short-term traders and algorithmic systems are programmed to exploit oversold conditions.
However, those rallies should not be confused with trend reversals.
A rally becomes meaningful only when it meets our trend-change criteria.
Until that occurs, the dominant assumption remains that rallies are part of a corrective environment, not the beginning of a new advance.
It is also important to recognize that several of last week’s sharp declines developed from sideways consolidations.
Technically, that type of pattern often represents the beginning of a directional move rather than the end of one.
That’s why patience becomes essential in environments like this.
The highest-probability opportunities often come after the first wave of volatility, once the market reveals where buyers are truly willing to step in.
For now, we continue to monitor the Techno-Fundamentals — price action, sector rotation, market internals, and macro influences — to determine when conditions shift from defensive to opportunistic.
Nothing changes in how we operate. We will continue to trade the same price patterns, manage risk the same way, and let the market—not opinions—tell us when opportunity is present.
If you're not in the Green Room with us, log in to YouTube, Facebook, or Twitter to get our pre-market review at 9 AM ET. If you can't make it, you can view the recording.
Be sure to log into your Member's Area to get connected to text messaging through Telegram -- it's critical to receive timely updates to new trades and trade adjustments! NOTE: New trade ideas included in these emails are not sent in Telegram when they trigger -- only subsequent needed adjustments. Alerts for Targets and Stops triggered are also not sent; it is your responsibility to set alerts and manage them following posted instructions if desired.
NOTE: Please see the document in RESOURCES entitled Master Trader Guidelines for Trading the Open and Gaps.
Because your success is vital to you – and us. Before selling options or credit spreads, we urge you to review the valuable and detailed information that we have provided for you in your Member’s Area.
Basic Money Management A quick simplified approach to calculating contract size is to simply base your contract size based on the number of shares permitted in your Trading Plan as if you were trading the stock or ETF. Simple Share Sizing = $ Risk / Stop Loss The amount of money that you are willing to risk – divided by – the stop loss amount.
For Example, $100 / .20 = 500 shares. Credit Spread example, if your Trading Plan allowed you to trade 543 shares of AAPL based on the stop loss, then simply round down to the nearest hundred and short an equivalent number of contracts of the option. Since 1 contract represents 100 shares of the underlying, this would be five (5) contracts.
Money Management for Trading and Investing
Proper money management for investing and Trading starts with position-sizing based on the amount of money you are willing to risk on a signal trade.
CLICK HERE to review these Master Trader Guidelines and Basic Money Management and Position Sizing Table.
NEW OPTIONS TRADING IDEAS
Here's our Checklist for shorting options/spreads using MTS. Spreads have unfortunately been wider than normal recently which is why the number of trades recommended in this letter has been fewer than normal. Additionally, when the VIX is low, the premium received has not been attractive. Most of you also subscribe to our Advisory Swing and Options Letter and, as you can see, we have many Directional ideas.

3/9: CRM – Over $203.00, consider shorting Mar (3/13) $192.5/187.5 bull put credit spread for a limit of $.65/share (closed at $.79/share). +123 Breakout of a bottoming pattern at the 20-MA. Stop $193.88 (however, stop out of position if the “debit/cost to close” the spread reaches 2x premium received, which would be $1.30/share in this case, which means that you are not risking more than 1:1).

Here are the results for last week, great job!

As you know, by selling spreads on stocks and ETFs where MTS indicates price is unlikely to go, we become the “smart money,” getting paid to take calculated, well-defined risk.
Check out the blog article with more information and monthly results, CLICK HERE
Professional consistency, short-duration trades, and risk-controlled income — that’s what defines the Master Trader approach.
Master Trader and You Building Your Financial Future Together!
Happy trading! If you have any questions or comments, please e-mail Greg Capra at Greg@mastertrader.com or Dan Gibby at Dan@mastertrader.com
All the best,
Greg Capra Managing Director of Master Trader
Dan Gibby Chief Options Strategist
NOTE: Master Trader will show the opening and closing prices of all stock and options trades. We recommend that all traders and investors use proper share sizing for positions and money management. However, we cannot recommend what that is for your particular trading style, risk tolerance, or account balance. We urge you to calculate your own share/position size based on your individualized risk parameters, Trading Plan, and familiarity with the proposed trade strategy and risk. Advanced Management Strategies (AMS) covers in detail foundation and advanced position and money management.
NOTE: Master Trader and its representatives may have existing positions in actual or other trade recommendations before or after suggested herein. Additionally, we may manage them differently for internal purposes based on different risk parameters than noted herein. All trade ideas and content are for informational and educational purposes only. It is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation that any security, option, or investment strategy is suitable for any person. Trading securities can involve high risk and the loss of any funds. Significant gaps or volatility can increase these losses, particularly for short option strategies. Investment or trading information provided may not be appropriate for all investors, and is provided without respect to individual financial sophistication, financial situation, investing time horizon or risk tolerance. Supporting documentation for any claims (including claims made on behalf of options programs), comparison, statistics, or other technical data, if applicable, will be supplied upon request. Master Trader Consulting, Inc. is not a licensed financial advisor, registered investment advisor, or a registered broker-dealer. Options, futures, and futures options are not suitable for all investors.





